用于支持世卫组织预防感染准则的文件“没有科学依据”

A surgery bepaly投注journal retracted a 2014 paper last month after discovering that the study has "no scientific validity."

马里奥·斯基特罗姆和他的合著者,based at theUniversityofL阿奎拉在意大利,报道称,在结直肠手术期间和手术后给予患者高浓度氧气可显著降低感染风险。Although the authors reported significant p-values,撤回通知bepaly体育赌博指出,“重新计算后,没有p值接近显著。UniversityofLAquila told bepaly手机注册网址bepaly体育赌博Retraction Watch it is investigating,但没有提供细节。

2014年研究美国外科杂志bepaly投注在世界卫生组织的一项分析中,有11项被引用来支持2016 guidelinesrecommending supplemental oxygen to prevent surgical infections in adults.(A2012纸作者也是分析的一部分。)

This is not the first time the statistical analysis in希特罗马work has been called into question.去年,这个bepaly投注Journal of the American College of Surgeons在确认“统计结果不正确,数据不支持文章结论”几个月后,撤回了一篇2015年的论文。a日本汽车制造商协会bepaly投注期刊发行expression of concernfor a 2013 paper after discovering "substantial overlap" with the retracted 2015 paper;这个日本汽车制造商协会编辑要求UniversityofLAquila toconduct a formal investigationinto the team's work.Schietroma已经two other papers retracted-去年一个,2013年一个-due to"similarities" to previously published work.

Paola Inverardi,吟诵者of the university,告诉bepaly手机注册网址:

We are still investigating,we will send you the conclusions of the investigation as soon as available.Please take into account that in order to verify the correctness of the research we need to interact with other institutions and this takes time.此外,我们需要遵守严格的程序协议,以确保我们的机构和被调查的研究人员。

We asked Inverardi who the researcher being investigated is but she did not respond.

Here's thebepaly体育赌博retraction noticefor "直肠癌选择性结直肠手术后的高浓度补充围手术期氧气和手术部位感染:一项前瞻性研究randomized,双盲,受约束的,single-site trial

应《华尔街日报》总编辑和编辑委员会的要求,这篇文章已被撤回。bepaly投注这项研究由一位统计学家和美国外科杂志高级编辑委员会进行了审查,发现研究结果缺乏统计意义。bepaly投注尽管表中报告了显著的P值。Upon recalculation,no p-values were close to significant.The study thus has no scientific validity to support the conclusions of the paper published in AJS and will be retracted.

The paper has been cited 15 times,according toClarivate Analytics的科学网.

Schietromatold us that he在得知该论文将被撤回之前,没有机会回应该期刊的担忧;bepaly投注他说他disagrees with the bepaly体育赌博retraction but did not clarify why nor elaborate on the alleged issues with the analysis.去年,Schietroma承认他可能误解了2015年的统计数据bepaly投注Journal of the American College of Surgeonspaper,though said the issues likely did not extend to the日本汽车制造商协会paper.

Schietroma said that,going forward,他的团队计划有一个独立的统计员“在提交文章之前检查我们的数据”。

像收放表?bepaly手机注册网址bepaly体育赌博You can make a支持我们增长的免税贡献,follow us在推特上,像我们一样论脸谱网,把我们添加到你的RSS阅读器,sign up for an email every time there's a new post (look for the "follow" button at the lower right part of your screen),or subscribe to our每日摘要.If you find a bepaly体育赌博retraction that'snot in our database,you canlet us know here.对于意见或反馈,email us atteam@bepaly体育赌博www.olap4all.com.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.Required fields are marked*

此网站使用Akismet来减少垃圾邮件。Learn how your comment data is processed.